Language is an important tool in shaping perception. The "toxic assets" of the 2008 financial crisis are now "legacy assets." A common practice discussed in a piece of legislation becomes a "death panel," and quickly garners opposition. One of the most prominent--and de-humanizing--uses of language is within the immigration debate. I saw this on Racewire today regarding the use of the word "illegal":
The real lie here is that we’re all illegal, and there’s no way of
reframing this to make it anything but the truth. The United States
began as a colony by a colonial empire, yet we behave as if we’ve
always been here. As if the sins of our past conquest make us better
than the crisis of globalization we’ve helped to create and the people
caught within it. The whole notion of “illegal” is an artificial
construction designed to dehumanize, deprioritize and deport without
any tugging on our American heartstring. I’m not an “illegal” because
I’ve run a red light, pirated software, cheated on taxes, or am Queer –
because these actions don’t violate the notion that I’m still an
American citizen. But take away that citizenship, built on a false
sense of global security and conquest, and somehow I’m not human?
Working within the framework of "illegal" vs. "legal" imposes a status on a group of people that is reminiscent of our country's history of slavery and is based on a broken, draconian, outdated system of laws. I'm trying to break out of this framework, whether with immigration, healthcare, or the economy, because words can have so much power without us even realizing it.
Recent Comments